Words of Liberty: John F. Kennedy

Posted in Blog on July 12th, 2012 by admin

By James J. Gormley

Here is a quote from John F. Kennedy in The Notes: Ronald Reagan’s Private Collection of Stories and Wisdom:

“The scarlet thread running through the thoughts and actions of people all over the world is the delegation of great problems to the all-absorbing leviathan—the state . . . Every time that we try to lift a problem to the government, to the same extent we are sacrificing the liberties of the people.”

Tags: , , , ,

The organic movement: protecting our food

Posted in Articles on January 23rd, 2012 by admin

By James J. Gormley

Some “difficult situations have developed as a result of the recent outburst of enthusiasm for the subject of nutrition and food [...] We regret the opportunity it has given faddists, zealots and other extremists to increase their customers, profits and power structure.”

Who would have bought into such paranoia and shortsightedness in November 1971? A massmarket food lobbyist? No. Try a Science Adviser for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) who was addressing the National Nutrition Education Conference.

The adviser went on:

“The indiscriminate distrust of scientific and technological progress that is displayed by such self-appointed guardians of our welfare–guardians who encourage others to be distrustful too–is another hazard in our nutrition and food environment. The surge of interest in buying ‘natural’ and organically grown foods is one manifestation of this distrust.”

These two observations take the cake:

“The commonly used pesticides about which the extreme environmentalists are so alarmed have undergone much more stringent and extensive testing than the products of the food extremists. [...] And how do they [the 'extremists'] justify a food production and diet scheme that, if adopted widely, would result in such a reduction in supplies that famine and death would be the fate of so many people?”

Since these ill-informed views are–incredibly–still held by one infamous massmarket-food industry funded organization and by a number of anti-organic bureaucrats, let’s clear them up on a few points.

As early as 8000 B.C., early farmers had already domesticated many wild food-plant species, with growers having cultivated thousands of different strains, each with its own hereditary genetic material, or “germ plasm.”

These traditional varieties are known as “land races,” and their vigor and diversity, alone, are the insurance for the future of our food supply.

Today, many growers and countries are abandoning these old land race crops in favor of genetically engineered, single-variety “monocultures,” making the entire world’s food supply ripe for complete, and utter, destruction.

Clear-cutting across virgin lands annihilates natural vegetation, bringing on what is called genetic erosion. By 2050, 25 percent of the world’s 250,000 plant species will disappear due to deforestation, the shift to genetically uniform crops, overgrazing, water-control projects and urbanization.

In Sri Lanka, for example, where farmers grew some 2,000 traditional varieties of rice as recently as 1959, only five main varities are sold today. In India, which once boasted 30,000 varieties of rice, today over 75 percent of its total production comes from less than 10 varieties.

In April 1991, plant geneticist Jack Harlan warned:

“The diversity of our genetic resources stands between us and starvation and us on a scale we cannot imagine.”

To prevent global disasters, groups are tracking down the wild relatives of modern crops in habitats believed to favor their survival–then preserving their germ plasm in a global network of gene banks and protected natural sites.

Organic growing is the key. Preserving plant diversity, the environment and our health–indeed, our future–will depend on whether we, as a planet, embrace organic methods … or not.

[Adapted from my article which appeared in the April 1999 'Earth Day' issue of Better Nutrition magazine]

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Fat City: What’s fueling America’s obesity crisis?

Posted in Articles on June 17th, 2011 by admin

By James J. Gormley

Fillet of a fenny snake,
In the cauldron boil and bake;
Eye of newt and toe of frog,
Wool of bat and tongue of dog,
Adder’s fork and blind-worm’s sting,
Lizard’s leg and howlet’s wing,
For a charm of pow’rful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.
– Second Witch, Macbeth, IV:1

This article by James Gormley originally appeared in Total Health magazine.

In 2002, people drank nearly 49 million gallons of soda (185 million liters), making it the third most popular commercial beverage after milk and tea. The typical bottling plant churns out over 79,250 gallons of soda per day. Here in the U.S., as annual soda consumption doubled to 49 gallons per person between 1970 and 2001, milk consumption fell by 30 percent.

National “cruel” lunch program
In light of exploding rates of childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes, school nutrition has become a growing public health concern. While most meals offered as part of the federal school lunch and breakfast programs may be relatively less unhealthy than the offerings available outside of the school cafeteria, “These school food programs compete against the widely available and aggressively advertised fast food, soft drink, and snack foods that fill vending machines, school stores, and a la carte cafeteria lines,” wrote the Urban and Environmental Policy Institute (UEPI) in a September 2002 report entitled Challenging the Soda Companies (1).

Many of the “same schools that offer health and nutrition education in the classroom are undercutting their own lessons by filling their hallways with chip and soda-dispensing vending machines,” noted the UEPI.

Boil and bubble
Speaking of soda, this beverage is a significant part of the problem of poor child nutrition, representing, as it does, hundreds of empty calories per day that contribute to several important health risks. For example, a standard 12-ounce can of soda contains about 160 calories and 1.5 ounces of sugar (2). Worse yet, many vending machines offer 20-ounce bottles that contain a whopping 250 calories and 2.3 oz sugar. According to government data, the average 12-to-19-year-old soda-consuming male drinks more than two cans per day (868 cans annually), while the average female consumes 1¾ cans a day.

For soda-consuming youth, these beverages provide from nine to 18 percent of total caloric intake and displace more-nutritious foods and beverages from the diet (3). Teenagers drink twice as much soda as they do milk, a nearly inverse relationship from the consumption patterns of 20 years ago (4). For each additional can or bottle of soda consumed per day over time, the risk of obesity and related health conditions increases by 160 percent (5).

In addition, soda consumption in kids also contributes to poor bone health. Because most girls have inadequate calcium intakes, they are more likely to suffer from osteoporosis (brittle bones) as they age and have an increased risk for broken bones while they are still young. Those who drink soda have a three-to-four times higher risk of bone fracture that do those who don’t drink soda (6). Soda consumption in young people is a concern to many health professionals because it displaces milk (a source of calcium) from the diet. In addition, soda also represents the largest single source of caffeine in children’s diets (45-100 mg per can) (7), and the sugar and acid in sodas combine to contribute to tooth decay (8).

According to Challenging the Soda Companies, “Soda companies like Pepsi and Coca-Cola have adopted marketing strategies to establish brand loyalty as early in a consumer’s life as possible, explicitly targeting school-aged children.”

“Schools offer these companies an ideal venue for targeting young people with their branding activities. A Coca-Cola official stated that his company would ‘continue to be very aggressive and proactive in getting our share of the school business’ “(9).

Food and beverage companies spend billions of dollars on advertising, and have started offering large payments for exclusive marketing rights in schools and other locations where children are present.

“These pouring rights contracts involve lump sum payments to school districts and additional payments over 5-10 years in return for exclusive sales of the company’s products in vending machines and at all school events,” says Challenging the Soda Companies.

“The contracts often allow constant advertising through display of logos on machines, cups, sportswear, brochures, and school buildings,” the UEPI report adds. “In this way, students receive constant exposure to the logos and products, an attempt by companies to create loyalty. Pouring-rights contracts result in students drinking more soda, vending machines in schools that previously did not have them, and vending machines in schools with younger children.”

“Non-happy meals”
According to a 2003 article by Barry Yeoman in Mother Jones (10), at a time when weight-related illnesses in children are escalating, “schools are serving kids the very foods that lead to obesity, diabetes and heart disease. According to Yeoman, under the National School Lunch Program the federal government actually purchases over $800 million in farm products each year and makes them available to schools.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), “which administers the system, calls this a win-win situation: schools get free ingredients while farmers are guaranteed a steady income. The trouble is, most of the commodities provided to schools are meat and dairy products” that are high in saturated fat, wrote Yeoman.

For example, in 2001, noted Yeoman, the USDA shelled out “$350 million on surplus beef and cheese for schools, more than double the $161 million spent on all fruits and vegetables, most of which were canned or frozen.”

Since the School Lunch Program’s inception in 1946, agribusiness has been able to exert significant control over what foods schools buy and don’t. According to Mother Jones, “In the mid-1990s, a group of health advocates met with the USDA to ask that schools be allowed to serve soy products like veggie burgers. According to one participant, a department official asked them, ‘Have you spoken with the Cattlemen about this? Until the Cattlemen go for this, we aren’t going to be able to move on it.’ “

Agribusiness’ gain in our (weight) gain
All in all, poor diet and a sedentary lifestyle kill 400,000 Americans a year, according to the President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, and U.S. deaths from poor diet and physical inactivity make up 17 percent of total deaths in the U.S.

About 64 percent of American adults are overweight or obese, and no surprise given soda over-consumption and the state of affairs at the National School Lunch Program that we discussed, our kids are catching up. Over the last 25 years, the number of children in the U.S. who are overweight has tripled—22 percent of kids are overweight. Specifically, 13 percent of children aged 6 to 11 and 14 percent of kids aged 12 to 19 are obese.

In fact, 60 percent of overweight children aged 5 to 10 have at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD); 25 percent have over two risk factors. Tied to obesity, sugar-packed diets and physical inactivity, type 2 diabetes in children is now the “new children’s epidemic,” a disease which used to develop almost exclusively in adulthood.

It’s not just kids—some sobering stats
According to a story run on CBS News on September 21, 2004 (11), researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill studied national beverage consumption patterns for more than 73,000 Americans between 1997 and 2001, and found the following:

•overall calories from sweetened beverages went up 135 percent;
•Americans took in 38 percent fewer calories from milk;
•Americans now get an average of 144 calories a day from sugary sodas and only 99 calories from milk; and for young people aged 2 to 18 years, milk consumption plummeted from 13.2 percent of total calories to 8.3 percent, and soda consumption doubled.

What is even worse, a study that appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) (12), researchers found that “greater consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with greater weight gain and an increased risk for development of type 2 diabetes in women, potentially by providing excessive calories and large amounts of rapidly absorbable sugars.”

“Get up (off the couch), and boogie”
In addition to those excess calories and sugars, exercise is critical to health. Nevertheless, according to the new Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005 (13), 25 percent of adult Americans “did not participate in any leisure-time physical activities in the past month, and, in 2003, 38 percent of students in grades nine to 12 watched three or more hours of television per day.

Although the Dietary Guidelines’ call for 30 to 60 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity a day could scare off many, fortunately the following activities also qualify: light gardening/yard work and walking. In fact heart, light gardening (330 calories an hour) burns even more calories an hour than do bicycling (290) or weightlifting (220). Hey, break out those gardening gloves!

Take-home tips
Based on our over-consumption of soda and junk food, we should be aware that the best foundation for responsible, sustained weight loss is vigorous, regular exercise and a nutrient-rich diet. Try the following tips:

•Avoid refined carbohydrates, including white flour, white rice, white sugar and other caloric sweeteners.
•Eat foods in as natural and fresh a state as possible.
•Emphasize non-starchy vegetables (such as salad greens, asparagus, broccoli and green beans) as your primary sources of carbs.
•Avoid soft drinks, fruit juices, alcohol and other highly processed drinks.
•Choose high-quality omega-6 oils: safflower, sunflower, borage, black currant seed, evening primrose, and one specific omega-9 oil: first cold pressed extra-virgin olive oil.
•Choose high-quality omega-3 oils: flaxseed, hemp, pumpkin seed and marine oils (DHA).
•Avoid fats rich in palmitic acid, such as coconut and palm oils. Steer clear of trans-fatty acids found in deep-fried foods, traditional tub margarine and foods that contain partially hydrogenated oils.

REFERENCES
1. Challenging the Soda Companies: The Los Angeles Unified School District Ban–A Report Prepared by the Center for Food and Justice (CFJ). Urban and Environmental Policy Institute (UEPI), Occidental College, September 2002.
2. Pennington JAT. Bowes and Church’s Food Values of Portions Commonly Used, 16th ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co., 1994.
3. Jacobson MF. Liquid Candy: How Soft Drinks Are Harming America’s Health. Washington, DC: Center for Science in the Public Interest, 1998.
4. USDA: NFCS, CSFII
5. Ludwig DS, et al. Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis. Lancet 2001;357:505-508.
6. Wyshak G. Teenaged girls, carbonated beverage consumption, and bone fractures. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
2000;154:610-613.
7. Ellison RC, et al. Current caffeine intake of young children: amount and sources. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95:802-804.
8. Erickson PR, et al. Soft drinks: hard on teeth. [Clinical Feature]. NW Dentistry 2001 March-April:15-19.
9. Nestle M. Food Politics, How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2002.
10. Yeoman, Barry. Unhappy Meals. Mother Jones, January/February 2003.
11. CBS News. Soda fueling obesity epidemic. The Early Show, September 21, 2004.
12. Schulze M, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. JAMA 292:927-934.
13. HHS/USDA. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005. US Department of Health and Human Services & United States Department of Agriculture. www.healthierus.gov/dietaryguidelines.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,